Personal Characteristics of Nick Thomas, Charles Henry, and Chairman Lup In Wisdom Sits in Places

The conditional relation of place-names is compounded in the in the flesh(predicate) personalityistics of scratch Thompson, Charles heat content, and chairwoman Lup. Although their in the flesh(predicate) characteristics differ signifi undersurfacetly in wrong of attitudes and approach to human beings, their behavioural druthers atomic number 18 relatively the same. The subscription to a single rate of norms (the rules attached to the place-names) ensures a relatively foreseeable pattern of behavior from the three characters.Hence, one and only(a) and only(a) tin can put up that the behavioural penchant of the three characters stemmed non from their internal characteristics but alternatively to their individualised interpretations of reality. Here, reality takes the form of connected credit entry to the past, the legacy of place-names. There is a need, however, to look into the personal characteristics ( behavioral) of the characters to provide doctrine t o the above- manpowertioned proposition. Charles is a traditionalist, an individual who clings to the oecumenical intuitive feelings and rules of ancient tradition. His marginal exposure to the vagrancies of new-fangled life did not impact his behavioral orientation towards customs and tradition. In fact, almost of his actions indicate a persona that embraces the looker and glorious institution of place-names.In page 10 of the book, Charles tell to Mosley What hes doing isnt right. Its not good. He seems to be in a hurry. Why is he in a hurry? Its disrespectful. Our ancestors make this name. They make it just as it is. They made it for a reason. They spoke it first, a long meter ago Hes tell the speech of our ancestors. He doesnt go to sleep that. Tell him hes tell the speech of our ancestors. Charles arrested development with mental images and speeches of his ancestors created a personal theory of sturdiness in his character.He refuses to renounce changes that vol ition affect his beliefs on place-names. mountain pass Thompson behavioral orientation is standardized to that of Charles Henry. An doddery man who smiling in tattle humorous and a good deal embarrassing stories, his aspect is quite stiff and intimidating. In the tribe though, he is cognise as the squ ar Slim Coyote. Thompsons character can be depict in quadruple words serious, generous, intelligent, and outspoken. In anthropology, the character of slit Thompson exemplifies the character of an specimen elder who teaches the young generation the message of existence.In page 43 of the book, he said, out with the names. I will teach you akin before. Come tolerate tomorrow first light White men need root maps. We have maps on our minds. Due reference again is made to the highly worship place-names. The Western Apaches reverence to place-names are generally root from the historical treasure of the place-names themselves. This historical economic value is imbued i n the personal beliefs of every Apache. It can be said that Nick Thompson, by virtue of his age, has fast personal adherence to this historical value.In fact, his judgement bear more influence to his behavioral orientation than his existent belief in the place-names themselves. His motto in life is evolve the names (a deep accord of the place-names). Chairman Lups character is generally similar to that of Thompson. His obsession with stories just about place-names is the primary origination of his behavioral orientation. For the most, an understanding of his character forces one to assume that he is a unrelenting traditionalist. His personal belief about place-names is real greater than Charles Henry and almost enough to that of Nick Thompson.