Israel †Lebanon War and related problems faced by the American community Essay

Introduction At the time of insensate war, democratic knowledge domain was, virtu everyy, confronted by only integrity threat, coming from communist regime of the Soviet Union. This foe, though being dangerous, was quite predic evade and civilized to certain extent. by and by the cold war seized it seemed that field would finally find global calm and mutual consent. However, things turned different and such hopes vanished into a thin air. The valet de chambre community faced bracing, formerly unwitnessed, threats related to religious, national, and ethnic intolerance.Commonly accepted, though ultimately mistaken, is the belief that the fighting against these threats must be narrowed trim back to the war against a particular enemy, human being terrorism. Comparing the old and in the raw world (time before and after the cold war) it must be celebrated that confrontation between democratic world and the Soviet Union was base on certain rules, preventing the world from the g lobal engagement. Confrontation with a red-hot enemy has no rules at all.It turns discover that to settle a conflict of a new reference is more(prenominal) difficult than it mappingd to be, part beca subroutine of the reason that sometimes it is, practically, impossible to detect a real instigant of a conflict. All participators of a conflict atomic number 18 guilty. Besides, among the other(a) real reasons is the great number of conflicting parties and, as a consequence, in that location is a highly complicated interlacement of interests. To treasure interests of one party without neglecting the interests of other one is almost an unattainable aim.The bright example of the conflict of new type is a currently continuing war between Israel and Lebanon. This war affects the events all over the world and Ameri nookie community in particular. Israel Lebanon war raises an align of problems that need to be solved by the world leaders as soon as possible. Short Historical B ackground It is reported that on 12 July 2006 al-Jihad initiated operation Truthful Promise named for a stipulation by its leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah to capture Israeli sol cloyrs and swap them for the stay three Lebanese held by Israel.The early morning raid into Israeli soil resulted in eight Israeli soldiers killed and two captured. Israel therefore responded with Operation Just Reward later renamed Operation Change of Direction. Israels justificative strike has thus far encompassed barrage raids by the Israeli phone telegraph wire Force (IAF), an air and Israeli Sea Corps naval barricade of Lebanon (especially southernmostern Lebanon and Beirut), a lastingness of tanks and armored personnel carriers, and some elfin raids into southern Lebanon by Israel Defense Forces (IDF) ground troops.Hezbollah has concurrently occupied in extensive rocket attacks on Israels northern cities, including Haifa. However, the Lebanese governance has constantly disavowed Hezbollahs ac tions and refused to condone them, while urgently calling for international peacemakers to end the conflict. (Wikipedia) This short passage gives a assailable and overall picture of the background of current postal service in spunk east. It must be noted that Hezbollah operations on Israeli soldiers capture was preceded by Israel occupation of the west bank of the Jordan River and Gaza Strip.This occupation was in its turn preceded by Hamas raid into Israel and capture of an Israeli soldier (CNN. com) This take of events can be untwined to infinity. Analysis of events and their projection at US extraneous Policy The world community acknowledges that Hezbollah is a terrorist organization which directs its actions against Israeli state. Respectively, no one denies Israels right to protect itself and its citizens as healthy as no one rejects Israels demand to disarm or destroy this organization.However, Hezbollah located its force camps on the soil of milkweed plainlyterfly s tate of Lebanon, the government of which is, virtually, incapable to control the activity of this organization. Now the dilute of Israel self-defense arises from a different perspective is Israel authorized to conduct military machine actions against terrorist organization on the territory of a sovereign country? And if ab initio most countries justified Israels actions, civil casualties made the world be divided basing on its reaction to the kernel East conflict. As it is tell in the article at CNN.com leaders in Europe and the Middle East see the attacks against Lebanon as disproportionate and this statement provokes a new capitulum at what exactly moment these attacks became disproportionate and Israel self-defence modify into aggression? When ten civilians were killed or twenty? This question is not a simple one as it raises the global problem of the right to use to weapon against certain country. It is directly related to the American community and to discombobulate i nto the root of the matter it would be useful to have recourse to the investigating of the question of the legality of the USA invasion into Iraq.Speaking about military invasion legality, as Crahan states, the answer may seem obvious the U. N. is the worlds premier political dead body, its Charter requires protective cover Council authorization for the use of force . (Crahan et al. , p. 135) No one can disagree with this statement. The situation in which the force can be applied is also obvious at that place should be continuous failure to take to the woods resolutions, carried by UN Security Council, or their systematic trespass.In particular, what concerns Iraq, there was an array of resolutions carried, which Iraq refused to arrange. exactly it is requisite to straighten out was it solely Iraqs fault? As Crahan further continues the world body had failed in all those years to attain the goals that the President was seeking, in mammoth part because the Council was bit terly and chronically divided on the critical question of how sometimes even on whether to enforce its numerous resolutions on Iraq. (Crahan et al., 135) hence it follows that the Council, while carrying its resolutions, even if under the pressure from U. S. side, itself resists their execution. Here the EC countries and Russia are to be fully reproached. No country in the world would execute any(prenominal) resolutions in such circumstances. However, when it came to the point when acts of force were very likely, Iraq, nevertheless, began to execute U. N. Security Council resolutions. But this time the USA and allies decided to arrange the invasion with complete neglect to international law of nature .Such complete neglect to the Council resolutions, even by its permanent members, caused the situation where UN Council turned into a fake organization, unable to solve global conflicts. Now it is time to indemnification to the case with Israel-Lebanon war, which is more compli cated. It should be noted that this war is, virtually, the war of basis Arabs against Israeli country where, unfortunately, peaceful civilians have to suffer. The UN Security Council has passed corresponding resolutions against twain enemy parties Hezbollah organization and Israel.It must be observed that UN Security Council also passed the resolution concerning Hezbollah in 2004 , however, two years passed and it bland was not applied either. Failure to fulfill this requirement was a titular ground for Israel to attack the territory of Lebanon. Moreover, the Security Cabinet of Israel agreed Israel volitioning not give up its demand for Lebanon to implement U. N. resolution 1559, which calls for the disarming of Hezbollah and any other militias, and the deployment of the Lebanese army in south Lebanon.(www. gopusa. com) However, scrutinizing this war in the context of the Arabs war against Israel, one should notice, that Israel made it its article of faith to violate UN re solutions as related to its enemies. It is necessary to key out the resolutions, the ground of which is the commandment of land for peace (See resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973), 1397 (2002) and 1515(2003) at spherical Policy Forum, July 13 2006). also it must be noted that Hezbollah movement is supported by Syria and Iran.Syria regards Israel as enemy country due to the Israels occupation of Golan Heights, territory of Syria. The cessation of occupation of these territories, according to the land for peace resolution, would stop Syrias support of Hezbollah. Important in that confrontation is the position of the USA. iodine should mention Council resolution, prevented by US, which was forwarded by Qatar as of July 13 2006. Some excerpts from this resolution are relevant hereThe Security Council, Reaffirming all its relevant resolutions, in particular, 242 (1967), 338 (1973), 1397 (2002) and 1515(2003), condemnatory military assault being carried out by Israel, the occupying o ccasion, in the Gaza Strip, which has caused the violent death and injury of dozens of Palestinian civilians, and the destruction of Palestinian property and civilian infrastructure, notably Gazas main power station, and condemning also the detainment of democratically elected Palestinian and other officials, Condemning also the shoot of rockets from Gaza into.Israel and the abduction of an Israeli soldier by Palestinian armed groups from Gaza, and the recent abduction and cleaning of an Israeli civilian in the West Bank, Calls for the immediate and unconditional dispense with of the abducted Israeli soldier Calls upon the Palestinian Authority to take immediate and carry on action to bring an end to violence, including the firing of rockets on Israeli territory ( world(prenominal) Policy Forum, July 13 2006) What exactly in this resolution was unacceptable for supplys administration that induced it to veto the given resolution?Was not it the fact that the resolution one mor e time reminded of systematic UN Council resolutions violation by Israel? Was not it a demonstration of double standards? The idea on this issue is clearly convey in the article The Economist Israel ignores the coupled Nations and has weapons of mass destruction. So why all the fuss about Iraq? in short after invading Kuwait in 1990, Saddam Hussein realised that he had made a mistake. But as the world debates the merits of another American-led war against Mr. Hussein, the idea has returned in a new form. Israel has violated innumerable UN resolutions and amassed weapons of mass destruction, say those who oppose this war.Why then is Iraq singled out for save more punishment while the Israelis get off scot-free? (www. economist. com, 2002). These question mud without answer. The analogy can be drawn between the case with Hezbollah and Israel and the behavior of a host as regards a plunderer. If a thief (Hezbollah) breaks into someones house (Israel) so what shall a host do? He should call police (in case with Israel appeal to the UN Security Council). And what does the host do? He starts striking with his axe destroying everything on his dash, including innocent neighbours. But as it turns out the host is himself on the wanted list for incalculable crimes (resolutions violation).What is then in this situation a host, victim or savage? And who is to be protected by police (by the USA)? Exactly such variation between the crime and punishment, elevation of one party and humiliation of another, provokes the Muslim world to hate the U. S. policy. Israels actions are treated by Arab countries as a challenge to the whole Muslim world. The USA and its citizens began to be looked at as Israels supporters who can disregard and manipulate international law leaning on their military and economic might. For a common American citizen this is a terrible situation. In any place of the world he or she becomes an object of hatred.US governments attempt to protect i ts people in military manner (in Iraq) and ignoring Israels aggression created the situation when neither in Europe nor even at home the Americans can feel safe (9/11 events). In other words, military methods, unapproved by world community, in fact, helped to solve Iraq or Hezbollah problems but flat generated many other problems. But leave alone Israel attain its aim (peace and detract the threat) when civilians die? Most probably it will not, while killed Hezbollah militants will be replaced by others those, who formerly were peaceful civilians but began to hate Israel because of bombings and there will be the same old story again.The behavior out from this predicament is to defend not only the interests of own nation and citizens but stand upon the value common to all mankind. Thus Israel defends its citizens by bombing Lebanon but it does not care for dying civilians what leads to conflict escalation . Like Israel, other countries are not governed by human values too. Thus B BC reportage on the evacuation of civilians from Lebanon states A British warship has dropped off clxxx UK citizens in Cyprus, and is returning to Beirut to pick up more people, A Norwegian ferry has taken hundreds of Norwegians, Swedes and Americans to Cyprus, while a US-chartered ship has left(p) Beirut with US citizens (BBC News). The immediate question arises should not they take starting line women and children from the territory of conflict?Only when American community realizes that human values are more important than any other, national, religious, ethnic or racial interests, and politicians adhere to this principle, only then the attitude of the world towards the USA and its citizens will change. Another aspect, that American community is confronted with, is constantly increasing military expenses. One can extirpate radicalism and extremism by military means but there is also a chance first to find reasons that induce extremism and then try to eliminate these reasons. Th us Ahmad S. Mousalli in the article Islamist Perspectives of Regime governmental Response The Cases of Lebanon and Palestine claims that Israel, Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Palestine are plagued, in one way or another, with poverty, inflation, underemployment, and exploitation.Many Palestinians or Egyptians, for instance, may turn to Islamism because of the corruption of their political elites, exploitation of the nouveau riche, nepotism, favoritism and the like. (1996, 53) In this view the part of expenses, spent on army, could have been directed to support and reorganize economy of the Middle East countries. One more thing that deserves American communitys prudence is that while possessing the veto power in UN Security Council, the US government abuses its power. To prove it there is a table below which shows the frequency of the use of the veto in the Security Council by different countries during the last decade. flow China* France Britain US Russia Total 2006 1 1 2005.2004 2 1 3 2003 2 2 2002 2 2 2001 2 2 2000 0 1999 1 1 1998 0 1997 1 2 3 1996 0 Table is taken from Global Policy Forum changing Patterns in the Use of the Veto in the Security Council Retrieved from http//globalpolicy. igc. org/security/ entropy/vetotab. htm The USA has a strong leading position in this table. This table is the confirmation of the following statement Many member states have expressed their criticism of the veto, arguing that the veto privilege is an anachronism responsible for a great deal of the Security Councils undemocratic and ineffective procedures.Not surprisingly, those enjoying the power of the veto dont want to give it up. (Global Policy Forum The Power of the Veto) So, the countries with veto power in Security Council should abandon it. completion The situation around Israel and Lebanon is not an exceptional one it reflects the general emphasis in the world. This war only confirms that the world policy desper ately needs revision. It is necessary to establish new world order and the USA has to degree this process. International relations must be established upon the principles different from those active today, in particular, economically powerful country while taking any actions is obliged to take into account the interests of less developed countries.To settle conflicts it is necessary to resume the authority of United Nations and entitle it to make decisions as regards resorting to force in conflict settlement. The resolutions carried by this organization must be authorisation to all countries. This conclusion can be best supported by words uttered by the ex-president of the USA immediately after the cold war a new era-freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, pairing and South, can prosper and live in harmony a world where the rule of law supplants the rul e of the jungle where the strong respect the rights of the weak. (Miller, Yetiv 2001, 56) Unfortunately, in 15 year period following that speech news line on BBC says The USA is going to accelerate military supplies of high-precision missiles to Israel. (BBC News) This is exactly the way George Bush junior and Israel decided to realize Bush seniors dream of the harmony in the world. Works Cited BBC News Dozens die in fresh Lebanon raids BBC News 19 July 2006. 22 July 2006 http//news. bbc. co. uk/2/hi/middle_east/5193662. stm.Crahan, Margaret E. , Goering John, and Weiss Thomas G. warfares on Terrorism and Iraq Human Rights, Unilateralism, and U. S. Foreign Policy. New York Routledge, 2004. Global Policy Forum Draft Resolution Proposed by Qatar, Vetoed By US.. July 13, 2006 Global Policy Forum The Power of the Veto. July 2006 Global Policy Forum ever-changing Patterns in the Use of the Veto in the Security Council July 2006 Hezbollah employment along border. United invoke Inter national. Gopusa Israel. 19 July 2006 .Kirkwood-Tucker, Toni Fuss. Germanys Opposition to the Iraq War and Its Effect on U. S. -German Relations. Social Education. 68. 4 (2004) 285+. Labott, Elise U. S. diplomatic options limited in Israel-Lebanon conflict. CNN. com Jul 15, 2006.22 July 2006 Miller, Eric A. , and Yetiv Steve A. The New World Order in Theory and go for The Bush Administrations Worldview in Transition. Presidential Studies Quarterly 31. 1 (2001) 56. Mousalli, Ahmad S. Islamist Perspectives of Regime Political Response The Cases of Lebanon and Palestine. Arab Studies Quarterly 18. 3 (1996) 53+. Press Release SC/8181. Security Council. 09 Feb. 2004 . 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 22 July 2006