Evaluating the Arts Essay

The two pennings of art I fork up chosen to issue about atomic number 18 both per patternance art musical compositions by Trisha embrown. Brown is a postmodern per tropeance artist whose work is shown throughout the join States, although mostly in small, liberal arts colleges, such as mill College in California. All of her works are considered to be extremely experimental, as well as extremely contemporary and postmodern. The first work is composition Walking Down the attitude of a Building. However, the actual still fit is called Walking on the Wall, and for our purposes, this is what will be studied. The still frame involves tailfin bodies, all literally hang up, walking on a wall.The five dancers are in no particular order. They are simply walking, in order, at any pace, down the wall. This 1971 routine was designed to be performed at a specific site, with the dancers suspended in harnesses, moving along the wall. The wonder of this piece of art is that on that poi nt is absolutely no metaphorical meaning. Now, that is not to feel out that there is no deeper meaning. There certainly is. But the piece is viewed by artists as completely unconventional, because this piece was originally a dance of sorts. However, there are no standard five positions of the feet, as maken in conventional, important ballet.There was no music, no stage set, nothing. It was simply movement, and gravity. Brown was onerous to have the audience understand that art does not need to have some sort of deeper meaning in order to be expensive thats already been done. The most intriguing part about this piece of art is the colors that were used. As it is all in black, whites, and grays, those shades belong the center of the piece, as well as the shadows. Because the shadows point in divers(prenominal) directions, it is difficult for the eye to simply focus on one section. In addition, this piece was made in the late 1970s.Of course, it was extremely controversial, as t he form of dance that was en vogue at the time were Balanchines undefiled ballerinas, who of course performed classical and neoclassical works. This was meant to be a rebellion of that form of work. The second piece of artwork I have chosen is a still of Browns Roof Piece (1973. ) Much the like Walking on the Wall, this piece was created as a postmodern resolution to art. In Roof Piece, the dancers were on twelve different rooftops over a ten-block area throughout New York City. Each dancer would transmit movements to a dancer on the nearest roof.Therefore, this was actually an improvisational piece. In addition, Browns artistic intent was to create a piece of art that had no metaphorical or symbolic meaning. In the still frame of this piece, it is wanton to see the fluid, yet also geometric design of the dancers. Of course, this still frame is also in black and white. However, what is particularly interesting about this piece is the way in which the background of New York City is blurry, while the dancer is in perfect focus. The artist obviously intended for the dancer to be the only one in the spotlight.With the busy connotations of the City, it is quite refreshing to see the dancer juxtaposed against the city. In addition, it is almost as if the dancer has been suspended in time, as if the dancer stopped moving so the photographer could find a good shot.Works CitedRoof Piece Brown. Ncf. Carleton. 20 Aug. 2007 . Trisha Brown Dance Company Man Walking Down the Side of a Building. Tate Online. Tate Online. 20 Aug. 2007 .