Ethical Issues Involved in End-of-Life Decision-Making Essay

halt-of-life decision-making entails looking into ethical, heathen, as well as, legal concerns. All of the aforementioned(prenominal) has to be c befully considered if one and all(a) has to decide to end his or her deliver life. This paper give look into the ethical, ethnicalal, and legal issues that go along with end-of-life decision-making. It similarly intends to state what therapist can contribute in his or her enfolding in the discussion of end-of-life decision making together with his or her colleagues, as well as, tolerants & adenine their families. Ethical Issues Involved in End-of-Life Decision-Making at that place are ethical indispensable issues intricate in end-of-life decision-making and some are the chase firstborn of all is the issue on utilitarianism, since this is verbalise to be the induction of goods then it is linked to the end-of-life decision-making as well (Ebenstein & Ebenstein 1991, p. 580). Here, it is said that actions are right in prop ortion as they tend to enhance rapture, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness (Ebenstein & Ebenstein 1991, p. 580). Happiness here is regarded as the absence of pain and unhappiness is the battlefront of the aforementioned (Germino 1972, p.240). It is an issue because happiness is not all that matters in end a life (Ebenstein & Ebenstein 1991, p. 580). In addition to that, how can one be sure that the absence of pain, which is death in this case, will unfold to happiness of the person chiefly involved in the end-of-life decision-making (Ebenstein & Ebenstein 1991, p. 580)? The same is true with the family of main person involved, will they be experience happiness if the patient role opts to end his or her life voluntarily instead of postponement for his or her natural death to take place (Ebenstein & Ebenstein 1991, p.580)? fleck is the issue related with the Kantian model or what is technically referred to as the deontological theory (Bennagen, 2 000, p. 50). This states that a person has to fulfill a certain tariff or duty as a part of his objective (Bennagen, 2000, p. 50). This dictation now seems to be irrational since the concrete definition of a duty or duty is not provided (Bennagen, 2000, p. 50). For vitrine, is it the persons responsibility to instance himself or herself to death (Bennagen, 2000, p.50). It may be his or her right to discern to live or die but if asked if it is his or her responsibility ashes a big question (Bennagen, 2000, p. 50). dwell but not least, on that point are some health care providers who are extremely certified more or less how much money is exhausted on patients and how effectively it is spent (Hinman, 2000, p. 9). Some individuals feel that the amount of money spent on terminally ill patients is not really worth it (Hinman, 2000, p. 9).This is highly unethical it is as if one is saying that money is far more classic than rattling trying to save a life (Hinman, 2000, p. 9). Cultural Issues Involved in End of Life Decision-Making Furthermore, on that point are some(prenominal) cultural issues involved in end-of-life decision-making as well and some are the following First of all, there are some members of a cultural minority that takes to be spoken to directly with regards to the disease that they are going through with(predicate) (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 516). Although, there are also some who do not (Searight et.al. , 2005, p. 516. ). In concomitant some immediate family members request that they be the ones to be spoken to only since they believe that informing the patient will only come upon the patient feel worse and will eventually negatively affect him or her (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 516. ). The same is true when it comes to making decisions with regards to the medications/treatment that the patient will bear with some family members prefer that they be the ones to be in charge about this instead of the doctor and/or the patient (S earight et. al. , 2005, p. 516. ).Second, patients who belong to a cultural group sometimes opt not to be directly assured about the disease he or she is going through particularly if its a life-threatening one (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 516. ). Third, some patients also would prefer to carry out certain religious activities and spiritual traditions so as to assist in their aesculapian checkup treatment, and eventually, their healing as well (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 516. ). Last but not least, some patients take into consideration their beliefs and outlook when it comes to the medical experts, suffering, as well as, the afterlife (Searight et.al. , 2005, p. 516. ). Legal Issues Involved in End-of-Life Decision-Making There are also certain legal concerns when it comes to end-of-life decision-making Most of the States disallows physician-assisted suicide for example in New York, it is unlawful under the general homicide laws (Legal stipulation of assisted/Euthanasia in the United States, n. d. , n. p. ). The same is true in Virginia wherein there is no law that actually covers physician-assisted suicide but there is a statute which imposes civil sanctions on persons assisting in a suicide (Legal situation of Assisted/Euthanasia in the United States, n.d. , n. p. ). My Participation as a Therapist in the handling of End-of-Life Decision-Making along with Colleagues There are several things that I may contribute as a therapist to my colleagues. I can share with them my knowledge with regards to how to communicate with patients of diverse culture (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 521. ). I can request them to demonstrate an interest to the patients cultural heritage for them to be able to give the patient culturally-sensitive care (Searight et.al. , 2005, p. 521. ). In addition to that, I will also let them know that it is important to give the patient autonomy especially when it comes to non-disclosure of medical information and family-centered decision-m aking because through the aforementioned, the patient will eventually feel that their cultural norms are existence respected (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 521. ). My Participation as a Therapist in the Discussion of End-of-Life Decision-Making along Patients and their FamiliesFinally, I may also be of great aid to patients and their families with regards to their discussion of end-of-life decision-making through the following 1) I will respect it if the patient prefers that his or her family members be the recipients of diagnostic and treatment information 2) I will make sure first who is the member of the family whos appointed to make treatment decisions before speaking to him or her or giving them an advice with regards to the medical procedures or treatment and 3)I will help them find other therapist/physician in case they are uncomfortable with the sure one and especially if their therapist/physician belong to the different ethnic background (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 521. ). As a therapist, I will try to sack them the best I can while considering their cultural background, incorporating my ethical/moral standards, and making sure that I will abide by the laws as well.ReferencesBennagen, P. (2000). Social Economic and Political Thought. Q. C. UP Press. Ebenstein, W. and Ebenstein, A. 1991, Great Political Thinkers Plato to the President.Harcourt Brace, forrard Worth. Germino, D. 1972, Machiavelli to Marx Modern Western Political Thought. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Hinman, L. M. (2000). Ethical Issues in End of Life Decisions A Guide to Understanding Differences. Retrieved April 28, 2008 from http//ethics. sandiego. edu/presentations/sharp/index_files/v3_document. htm Legal Status of Assisted/Euthanasia in the United States. (n. d. ). Retrieved April 28, 2008 from http//www. nightingalealliance. org/pdf/state_grid. pdf Searight, H. R. & Gafford, J. (2005). Cultural regeneration at the End of Life Issues and Guidelines for Family Physi cians. American Family Physician, 71(3), 515 522.